A Treatise on Grief
Is it
like the ocean with its never-ending gray, blue waves, stretching as far as the
eye can see, cresting and falling, persistent, enough to cover most of the
globe?
Or
does it run out, like water in a tap that’s been running for too long? Like
puddles of rain drying up under the scorching summer sun?
Does
one person have enough grief inside to mourn the loss of 3 people? What about
the lives of 30? 3,000? What about 5
lives every day of every month in a year? (That’s how many people died in
terrorist-incidents in Pakistan in 2016 – see source at the end.)
Can
grief peter out, like a stream in a drought-stricken village?
Or
can we be more generous and dole it out as, when and where it’s needed? Does
anyone really need your grief? Can you offer it like a tissue to wipe someone’s
tears? Maybe cancel out a small part of their grief by showing them yours, like
same signs in an equation?
When
people point out that a tragedy somewhere is equally tragic as those occurring
in other parts of the world, I wonder what that means. How do we equate tragedy? Is it the number of casualties? Is it the age of the victims? Is it the location – a market, a mosque, a
festival, a bar, a concert arena, a street, a bridge? What about frequency? Isn’t is more tragic when one after another
attack happens in the same 100 mile radius for days, weeks, months, years?
Reality
proves otherwise. Theoretically, we
might say that the latter is true, but we all live in the same world and we all
know how our brains work. It’s shameful
but maybe we can blame god for creating the human brain in a way that makes us
get used to anything. It’s really like
putting your foot into a tub of piping hot water – it burns for a few minutes
and then you get used to the temperature.
And that’s how it is for me as a Pakistani – enough bombs and
explosions, deaths and injuries, attacks and invasions and after a while, it
starts to pinch a bit less each time. It
has to, of course, because otherwise we would have all died of grief long ago, bled
out, hollow, unable to go on.
Is
that the real tragedy?
The phenomenon of becoming numb to pain, of seeing and
hearing something so frequently that it becomes the norm, part of your everyday
life, another headline you skim quickly over breakfast, sad, yes, but nothing
to shatter your life, nothing that makes you give up what you’re doing, throw
up your hands and sink into a pool of tears.
I
remember I was in the US when the Boston marathon attack took place, and I
remember watching scores of people in my university stricken with grief and
horror, frozen in front of their televisions, and I remember how starkly I felt
the difference. The difference between people
living in developed countries (whose governments simply attacked far-off
countries or pointed accusatory fingers at their developing ‘allies’ to attack
their neighbours, regardless of the ensuing mess that would wrap the latter’s region
for years to come) and people like me who had to get used to grief, who had to
teach themselves to devalue human life, to detach, to move away, to see
casualties as numbers rather than individual persons with real lives and
families that live on with broken minds and hurting hearts.
In the
last few months, there have been a series of terrorist incidents in England and
I remember thinking to myself, oh my god, it almost feels like things are as
bad here as they were back home. I
remember looking up online to compare the tragedies in Pakistan to the ones in
UK and feeling my heart shrivel up like paper burning in a fire, because in
May, I had already forgotten about the attacks that killed 88 people in Sehwan
at a shrine, and 14 people in Lahore at a protest in February. I reread the articles with tears of shame and
grief streaming down my face. How could
I have forgotten it?
But
that is the ugly confession of a Pakistani.
When
people are killed at that frequency, your mind starts to pick and choose – portioning
out grief depending on the death toll – anything above 20 feels like a punch in
your chest, anything above 50 chokes your throat. And then there are cities and towns that have
been showing up in the news for so long that the tragedies there have dulled
for us – and the nails only dig deeper when a different target shows up – a
shrine closer to the city where I grew up, a park in a city where I did my
undergraduate degree, a market in the town where my family has moved to, a resort in
a village where I thought things were improving.
It is
such an ugly reality, but one that I have to live with.
After
the attacks in the UK, I saw how communities here came together (exceptions
always exist but the larger reaction was one of strength and harmony), the concert,
One Love Manchester, such a beautiful show of solidarity and courage, with
songs of hope and beauty being sung by thousands of people together, the
memorials that sprung up in cities across the country, roses and candles and
hugs and hands held together in strength and in prayer …
And I
wondered if people who live here realize how lucky they are to live in a place
where the value of a human life is so great, where people have enough grief to
spread over all their pain and heal together.
And a
part of my heart wrenches in pain, and in envy, wondering if there will ever
come a time when it can be the same in my country. A time when bombs and explosions are a thing
of the past, an anomaly that shakes the entire country rather than something
part of everyday reality that is swallowed like an inevitable bitter pill. When the loss of even a single life can be
felt, can be mourned, and grieved for, deeply, sincerely, by our politicians
and our leaders, by our neighbours and our people, and by us.
Source for above statistics: http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/countries/pakistan/database/casualties.htm
Comments
Post a Comment